<span>x 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>
The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract.
<span>x 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span>
The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern.
I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
No, because if he runs 7/30 mile each day he will run 210 miles each week because he is running 30 miles every day so he has to run 7/4.28 miles each day of the week to get 30 miles each week.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
What can be used as a statement in a two column proof?
A two-column proof consists of a list of statements, and the reasons why those statements are true. The statements are in the left column and the reasons are in the right column. The statements consists of steps toward solving the problem.
