You multiply 6.5 *4 =26 then you multiply 26 *6= 156 so that's $156.00.
Answer: a. 0.6759 b. 0.3752 c. 0.1480
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : The long-distance calls made by the employees of a company are normally distributed with a mean of 6.3 minutes and a standard deviation of 2.2 minutes
i.e. 
minutes
minutes
Let x be the long-distance call length.
a. The probability that a call lasts between 5 and 10 minutes will be :-
b. The probability that a call lasts more than 7 minutes. :
![P(X>7)=P(\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}>\dfrac{7-6.3}{2.2})\\\\=P(Z>0.318)\ \ \ \ [z=\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}]\\\\=1-P(Z](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28X%3E7%29%3DP%28%5Cdfrac%7BX-%5Cmu%7D%7B%5Csigma%7D%3E%5Cdfrac%7B7-6.3%7D%7B2.2%7D%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3DP%28Z%3E0.318%29%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5Bz%3D%5Cdfrac%7BX-%5Cmu%7D%7B%5Csigma%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D1-P%28Z%3C0.318%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D1-0.6248%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5B%5Ctext%7Bby%20z-table%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D0.3752)
c. The probability that a call lasts more than 4 minutes. :
Answer:
Assume ΔABC is an acute triangle.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the triangle ABC.
We have to tell the first step of indirect proving ΔABC is not an acute triangle.
An indirect proof, also known a proof by contradiction. When we use indirect proof method, we assume the opposite of our theory to be true and then by applying our assumed theory we contradict the given statement which proves our supposition is wrong. In other words, we assume our theory is false.
Hence, our first step is to
Assume ΔABC is an acute triangle.
Third option is correct.
3x + 34
x = 4
Substitute x:
3 times 4 = 12
12 + 34 = 46
The answer is 46.
Hope this helped
