All of the aforementioned were designed to help the Allied powers during World War II. Even though the US wanted to stay "neutral" when World War II broke out, they did want to benefit by maintaining economic relationships with these countries.
The Lend-Lease Act is a perfect example. This allowed the US government to lend weapons and other materials to nations like France, Great Britain, and China during World War II. If the goods weapons/materials were destroyed, it was on the country using them to replace it.
The Cash and Carry policy was another example of the US government helping the Allied powers. This policy stated that countries may buy materials from the US, as long as they pay in cash and provide transportation for the materials at their own risk.
Both of these show that even though the US was not technically in the war yet, they heavily favored the Allied powers.
He was sentenced to six years in prison for his involvement in protesting
The correct answer is D) 97%.
During the Civil War, the percentage of firearm production that was controlled by the Union was 97%.
According to the graphic that compares the resources between the Union Army and the Confederate Army during the Civil War, we can see how the industry of the Union states favored the circumstances of the Northern states over the Southern states that heavily depended on agriculture and slavery. The Union had fabrics and railroads that helped them transport war supplies to different parts of the territory. They also had more money in the bank to finance the war effort.
Answer:
Explanation:
Thomas Paine published Common Sense in 1776. He wrote this with one purpose: independence.
He hoped that his pamphlet would stir up feelings of discontent and anger to convince more colonists to join the movement of independence. He knew American independence was necessary and inevitable, but was also aware that more support translated to better results.
So he didn't think independence was impossible, uncertain, or illegal, but he suggested it was <u>just a matter of time.</u>
