Answer: It is not.
Explanation:
The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.
This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.
For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's *<u>final walk-through</u>*, and *<u>logs the evidence</u>*.
Explanation:
It's been a few years since I've taken the class, but I finished the class with my grade over 99% so I'm probably remembering this correctly.
EDIT: Emergency correction, Final Walk-Through is correct, Logs the Evidence is NOT. This narrows the second blank down to only two options, I'll leave it to whoever reads this to use common sense and guess between the two.
The Roe v. Wade case
is not one that the Warren Court established.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Roe v. Wade, a court case of the US Supreme Court was a landmark decision that protected the pregnant woman's liberty to have a choice to have an abortion without government restriction. The Ruling court for Roe v. Wade case is the Supreme Court of the United States.
The term Warren Court applies to the highest court of the United States under Chief judge Earl Warren, which was held from 5 October 1953 to 23 June 1969, and is arguably one of the two significant times of American constitutional law history.
Warren, as Chief Judge, used his political power to direct the Court into decisions that are often contentious and which dramatically increase civil rights and freedoms and the judicial branch.
Warren Court essentially ended racial discrimination in U.S. government schools, expanded plaintiffs ' constitutional rights, guaranteed equal opportunity in state parliamentarians, banned public school state priests, and paving the way for abortive legalization.
Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of local, state, or national government are invalid if they conflict with the Constitution. It also gives courts the power to declare an action of the executive or legislative branch to be unconstitutional.
