1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
4 years ago
6

Oscar has a degenerative eye disease that is causing him to gradually lose his eyesight. When Oscar asked his employer to purcha

se a low vision computer for his use at work, he was instead let go. This violates provisions of the: A. Civil Rights Act, Title VII.B. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.C. Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA).D.Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).E. Privacy Act.
Law
1 answer:
SOVA2 [1]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Explanation:

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law in 2008 to ensure that the discrimination against persons with disabilities in jobs, schools and all places are not found. It guarantees equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment and general accommodations. The protection this law gives to individuals is similar to that given to people based on race, gender, age and religion.  

So by relieving Oscar, who has degenerative eye disease of his employment is a violation of the provisions of ADA.

You might be interested in
Do hippo’s deserve rights?
maw [93]

Answer:

it depends if they like hotdogs or not

Explanation:

if they do, then yes they deserve righs. If not, kill them.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Guys watch out for katie she'll delete your questions and answers, can steal your points
drek231 [11]

Answer:

thanks for telling us

Explanation:

:)

6 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
What is a federal law? Name 3 examples.
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

Federal law is the foundation of the highest or the national level of the federal government, consisting of a constitution, enacted laws, and court decisions pertaining to them.

Three examples would be: laws on commerce, bankruptcy, and taxation made at the federal level.

Reference:

Your Dictionary. (n.d.). Federal Law. Retrieved from:

yourdictionary.com/federal-law

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Delete my post again and your not using this no more
frez [133]

Answer:

whatever you want to do it again lol I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I don't know what to say to you I

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When parallel parking, the space you choose to park in should be at least as long as what?
    8·2 answers
  • Identify a problem for which we need a law.Explain you're answer
    5·1 answer
  • Marty stabs Chris’s hand while playing poker because he is mad he is losing. Ordinarily, a person could just wrap a wound like t
    10·2 answers
  • Cases that originate at the state level can never be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. TRUE OR FALSE?
    15·1 answer
  • How do most anchors hold a recreational boat in place?
    9·1 answer
  • Provide a summary of the 10 sections of the legislative Branch.
    13·1 answer
  • A man walks into a bar orders a drink and asks the bartender why he chose that profession. The bartender tells him that you don'
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Defined National Prosecution Services?
    14·1 answer
  • The SABC implements a "no
    13·1 answer
  • In a short essay of approximately 50 words, describe Guiteau’s motivation for assassinating President James Garfield and what ac
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!