1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
4 years ago
6

Oscar has a degenerative eye disease that is causing him to gradually lose his eyesight. When Oscar asked his employer to purcha

se a low vision computer for his use at work, he was instead let go. This violates provisions of the: A. Civil Rights Act, Title VII.B. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.C. Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA).D.Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).E. Privacy Act.
Law
1 answer:
SOVA2 [1]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Explanation:

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law in 2008 to ensure that the discrimination against persons with disabilities in jobs, schools and all places are not found. It guarantees equal opportunity for persons with disabilities in employment and general accommodations. The protection this law gives to individuals is similar to that given to people based on race, gender, age and religion.  

So by relieving Oscar, who has degenerative eye disease of his employment is a violation of the provisions of ADA.

You might be interested in
The only real predictable thing about a drug and how an individual will respond to a drug is
madam [21]

I totally agree with that.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help I need this for a Law and Order class! will give brainliest for right answer!
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

It is often the case in revolutions that many who take a lead role in shaping the new society are not those who instigated a revolution in the first place. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were both too young to be revolutionary instigators (they were just 14 and 10 respectively when the Stamp Act was passed) but by the 1780s they had risen to prominent positions within the new nation. Both would contribute to the Revolutionary War, Madison as a state assemblyman and Hamilton as a soldier, and both would earn selection to the 1787 Philadelphia convention. Each would play a lead role in determining the political make-up of the new nation: Madison as a political philosopher and architect of the Constitution; Hamilton as a forceful advocate for centralised political and economic power. Both were nationalists, envisaging the great potential for the future United States; both were at the forefront of the Federalist movement.

James Madison was physically an unremarkable figure, barely 158 centimetres tall, pale-skinned and sickly looking, with a high-pitched voice that was often inaudible in public meetings and assemblies. He was quite anti-social, disliking company and crowds, though those with whom he did mix described him as an erudite conversationalist. Madison had entered the Virginia assembly in 1776 and proved something of a junior Thomas Jefferson. His hard work and attention to detail earned him considerable respect, despite his young age. Like many of his colleagues, Madison was alarmed at the social disorder permitted by the watery Articles of Confederation, so he eagerly accepted a nomination to attend Philadelphia. There he tabled his famous ‘Virginia Plan’ for a three-branch federal political system, combining existing ideas (such as the British political system and the separation of powers theorised by Montesquieu) with his own innovations, guided by his keen knowledge of political philosophy and his precise attention to detail. Though his model was subsequently amended by the convention, Madison would later earn the epithet ‘father of the Constitution’, though it was a title he spurned. And while he opposed the inclusion of specific individual rights into the Constitution, when this concession was made to the anti-Federalists Madison alone drafted the Bill of Rights. Madison later went on to become the fourth president of the United States between 1809-17.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT an obvious racial determination?
Finger [1]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's cross-section shape

8 0
3 years ago
Why was trump impeached
exis [7]

Answer:beacus he was voted out by the senate

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should law students be able to get compensation for internships that count toward graduation?
Goshia [24]

Answer:

YES!

Explanation:

law students should be able to get compensation for internships if they count toward your graduation! i mean you should still get compensation for internships but if they do count toward your graduation; you definitly should.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is one of the major arguments against term limits for state legislators?
    15·1 answer
  • Globalization is a trend that is making the world more
    5·1 answer
  • WHO WAS THE FIRST U.S. PRESIDENT TO LIVE IN THE WHITE HOUSE?​
    11·2 answers
  • Which process does the US Supreme Court follow to make its decisions.
    6·2 answers
  • (MC)Law enforcement begins with whom?
    13·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST URGENT
    13·2 answers
  • Conflicts happen in all careers. What can help to reduce the damage that a conflict can cause on a project or I a team?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the roberts court rule in favor of business
    13·1 answer
  • Under the statute of ______, if legal remedy is sought against a person, the pursuer must bring a court action within a specifie
    13·1 answer
  • The first law requiring food labels to contain nutrition information was passed in 2000. True or false?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!