Answer:
This baseline analysis focuses first and foremost on immigration's direct effect on the economy through the addition of workers to the labor force. At the most basic level, immigration increases the supply of labor in the economy. More labor means more goods and services being produced, so that national output (GDP) rises.
Immigration also affects the prices of the inputs that are used to produce these goods and services. Those inputs for which immigrant labor substitutes will suffer as the prices of their services fall. Simply put, "substitutes" means two things that are very similar to one another. As a homely example, red apples and green apples are almost perfect substitutes, so that an increase in the number of red apples would not only reduce the price of red apples, but also simultaneously lower the price of green apples by about the same amount. In the context of immigration, whereas we shall see many immigrants are unskilled laborers, the strong presumption is that immigrants are substitutes for domestic unskilled labor.3 Therefore, an increase in the number of immigrants will generally decrease the wages of domestic unskilled workers.
Immigrants are not substitutes for all domestic workers. A disproportionate number of immigrants are low-skilled relative to native workers, and so tend to be poor substitutes for workers other than the low-skilled—that is, they do not do the same things at all. In the jargon of economics, two factors that are not substitutes are called "complements." For a simple example, think of supervisors and production workers. Suppose that, for every 50 production workers, we need one supervisor. If we increase the number of production workers, we will need more supervisors and their wages will rise. An increase in the number of immigrants, then, will raise the wages of those domestic workers who are their complements. The common presumption is that skilled domestic workers are complements for immigrants, so that an increase in the number of immigrants will raise the wages of domestic skilled labor. Capital may also be a complement to immigrant labor, although the evidence on the complementarity of unskilled labor and capital is more ambiguous than that of skilled and unskilled labor. In summary, an increase in immigration flows will lead to higher incomes for productive factors that are complementary with immigrants, but lower incomes for factors that compete with immigrants.
The Judeo Christian and the Greco Roman beliefs is reflected In America through the rule of law.
<h3>What is reflected in the rule of law?</h3>
What is reflected in the rule is that no one in the democratic situation of the United States is above the law.
This is to say everyone including the president is within the whims of the law and he must abide by it.
Read more on Judeo-Christian beliefs here:
brainly.com/question/1300223
#SPJ1
Answer:
The annexation of the Philippines was considered an honorable decision by Albert Beveridge because he was an imperialist who believed the US was superior to any other country and therefore had the right to expand further into any foreign territory they so choose
Explanation:
One of the reasons he believed America was superior was because he believed the white people were superior and therefore they should conquer the world and since America at the time was ran by the white race he believed it was superior by default.
<span>The growth of railroads opened up vast swaths of previously inaccessible territory, catalyzed new industries, and changed the lives of everyday people. With the advent of rail transportation, citizens had access to goods, including perishables, which would have presented a previously impossible logistical challenge to transport to their locations, and also had the ability to more easily access large cities for business or leisure. In the case of farmers, rail enabled them to quickly transport their crops to market, opening up major commodity trading centers such as Chicago where crops could be aggregated and sold.</span>
