1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zepelin [54]
3 years ago
13

It was rare for children would turn in their own parents for criticizing the Nazi regime

History
2 answers:
Anna71 [15]3 years ago
6 0
It was definitely not rare and happened a lot. Children grew up believing it was correct and that if their parents or anyone went against it they should turn them in and report them.
amid [387]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

like why would they if they did that would've been bad

You might be interested in
Do you agree with socrates that there are absolute standards for truth and justice? why or why not
MrRa [10]
I would say that there aren't really any absolute standards for truth and justice. The reason for this is that considering we're only one species that has evolved out of apes, it is really hard to say whether the way we perceive reality and discover things through science can be thought as an absolute standard for truth. From this perspective it's even harder to find an absolute standard for justice. 
6 0
3 years ago
What would happen if a state law violated the U.S. Constitution?
ololo11 [35]
They would get in big big trouble with the state
3 0
3 years ago
The Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in June 1914 in Serajovo. T or F
Nuetrik [128]

The Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in June 1914 in Serajovo.

This is true

8 0
3 years ago
Which first bike made in world​
bija089 [108]

Answer:

German Inventor Karl von Drais is credited with developing the first bicycle. His machine, known as the "swiftwalker," hit the road in 1817. This early bicycle had no pedals, and its frame was a wooden beam. The device had two wooden wheels with iron rims and leather-covered tires

Intresting question though

4 0
3 years ago
What resulted from the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Mashcka [7]

Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.

<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.

The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Although failure to vote is not punishable by law, how could voting be considered a responsibility of all citizens? PLEASE ANSWE
    9·2 answers
  • What did the u.s. do to affect the outcome of the korean war?
    14·1 answer
  • The first westward surge of settlement reached the:
    7·2 answers
  • What was the political goal of the mandate system?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following five statements are the essential requirements in creating a government? Select all the apply.
    11·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of the Sugar Act of 1764?
    12·1 answer
  • What brought an end to the dominance of the silk road
    14·1 answer
  • How did creating a code of laws help hammurabai by govern over his growing empire
    14·1 answer
  • Giai cấp công nhân đầu thế kỉ 19 có đặc trưng như thế nào
    11·1 answer
  • Create an add to either join the union or work for the Baldwin-Felts Detective Agency.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!