Add a cliff hanger and change subjects.
Answer:
You can use the following three ideas:
Concept:
1) Strong ideas are disruptive in unique ways/unexpected ways.
Writing process:
2) Successful strong ideas attract the attention of the reader without confusing them, and leads them to re-evaluate a certain aspect of the reality evoked by it.
3) Strong ideas have to be handled carefully to prevent confusion or lack of specificity.
Explanation:
1) Strong ideas are meant to shake the reader. They ought to either challenge previous ideas about a certain topic or propose a whole new different way to assess said topic or phenomenon. The quality of strenght is attributed to an idea when it has the potential to renovate a traditional concept or assessment criterion.
2) If the idea is truly strong, then the reader is probably going to be bewildered at first. It has to be clear enough to prevent undesired effects such as distraction and confusion, and achieve engagement. If the reader is "hooked up" satisfacotorily, then a reflective process is going to begin so that they can connect the new, strong idea to the reality they know.
3) A strong idea needs to be explained, either by implicatures or expressively, through sufficient means to be clear to the reader. If the idea is meant to provoke an ambiguous effect, then the attention to detail in this aspect needs to be stronger.
The Most Remembered and Most Often Quoted Statement
<em>The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. </em>I think that every American is well aware of the Gettysburg Address. They may not remember much about anything anyone else said, but we all remember the contents of Lincoln's remarks. It is taught in almost every school and at every grade level (nearly). It is as unAmerican to claim that no one will remember it as it is to claim that we do not have a democracy anywhere on earth. Not substantiated. At least in Lincoln's case.
<em>that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.</em> This is the hardest one to make a comment about. It didn't look that way when in 1870 the 15th Amendment was passed. It sounded like slaves and others (Native Americans for one) were granted immediate freedom with the right to vote, but the states had ways of fighting back. It was not until the mid 1960s that this opinion began to be just words on a paper. I'd it was substantiated, but it took generations before you could say it really was so.
<em>That government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. </em>It remains to be seen whether this one is true or not. Great challenges like ahead. I don't think you could say either way.
Answer:
I'm so sorry but I can not see your picture could you type it so I can answer it???
Explanation:
