1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
disa [49]
3 years ago
7

What do many believe to be the U.S.'s biggest foreign policy failure in recent years?

History
1 answer:
Lelu [443]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. Abandoning those living under brutal regimes and denied human rights is seen as a past foreign policy flaw.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
During the early 20th century , countries such as Germany, russia, and Italy experienced an expanding role of state power in man
Tasya [4]
The answer is D: totalitarian dictators rising to power. Each country listed above had a totalitarian head of state; Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini
3 0
3 years ago
Abstract Art was an expression of
N76 [4]
A. Modernism is the answer
7 0
3 years ago
This chart shows the percentages of African Americans registered to vote in Mississippi from 1964-1982. What BEST accounts for t
Vanyuwa [196]
The answer is B) Congressional Legislation was passed that made registering to vote safer for African Americans.<span />
6 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt:
frozen [14]

Option C. From the passage that we have here what Abigail Adams was saying was that her husband has to consider the the laws of the new government would affect women like her.

<h3>What is the summary of the passage?</h3>

The summary here is that she is telling her husband on the reasons whey the men in the society should not be given too much power to surpass that of the women according to her, it may cause them to become tyrants who did not care about women.

She tried to talk about the ways that the former leaders of America made the women in the land to have no rights. Hence we can say that she was fighting for the rights of women here.

In summary we can say that From the passage that we have here what Abigail Adams was saying was that her husband has to consider the the laws of the new government would affect women like her.

Read more on Abigail Adams here

brainly.com/question/903349

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Does supply-side economics work? Why or why not?
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

It depends

Explanation:

<h3>What is Supply-Side Economics?</h3>

Supply side economics is an economic theory that supports deregulation and tax cuts. It focuses on making business easier believing in positive effects that will be felt by the entire economy. It encourages businesses and the wealthy to save or invest, increasing GDP and ultimately growing the economy. In sum, it is a form of fiscal policy that benefits businesses before consumers. (Opposite of Keynesian theory)

This theory can be visualized and a little bit better explained with something called the Laffer Curve. I've attached an image of this curve on my answer that might aid your understanding.

The laffer curve works like this: On the x-axis you'll see the tax rate and on the y-axis you'll see government revenue. You'll notice that it is a bowed-out shape, indicating that as tax rates increase past a certain point, government revenue actually decreases. This is because the tax rate is so high that the marginal benefit of working becomes close to 0, and the wealthy have little incentive to work because their wealth will go to the government anyway. Supply-side economics uses this theory to advocate for lower tax rates that will incentivize people to work, invest, save, and ultimately be part of the economy.

<h3>Does it work?</h3>

The short and easiest answer to if supply-side economics works is it depends. This is because it really depends on the specific policy, how it;'s implemented, and the overall state of the economy. Additionally, it also depends on what is specifically meant by "Does it work?" Is economic growth the only factor being considered?
As you can see by the Laffer curve, if tax rates are already past the vertex, supply-side economics will increase tax revenue while keeping the economy productive. However, if it has not reached the vertex yet, and further tax cuts are made, the economy may grow, but the government may find itself in debt due to not enough revenue.
On the other hand, if the economy is in a recession, tax cuts are certainly able to boost the economy by giving people more spending power. If the economy isn't, drastic tax cuts could result in inflation. Moreover, economists disagree on whether the trickle-down economic benefit really exists. Some have found that tax cuts increase GDP, while others believe that there is a minimal effect.

<h3 /><h3>History of Supply-Side Economics</h3>

As I mentioned previously, the base of supply-side economics is really the Laffer Curve, which was created by economist Arthur Laffer back in the 1970s. However, what really made supply-side economics a widely known phenomenon is President Ronald Reagan and his economic policy in the 1980s, which is why supply-side economics is often referred to as Reaganomics. You can further evaluate the effectiveness of supply-side economics by looking at the effects of its implementation throughout history.  For example, Reagan's implementation of the policy was able to drastically reduce the stagflation in the time period, however, it also contributed massively to the US national debt due to the lower tax revenues.
President Bush also utilized this policy, though the positive effects on the economy are often contributed to other factors and some even argue that he set the economy up for failure during the 2008 recession by increasing deficits.


Of course, the economy is a complicated system that depends on a variety of factors, so it is impossible to contribute economic growth to one cause. Therefore, it really depends on other factors, the state of the economy, and the implementation of the policy to truly determine if supply-side economics work in each scenario.

Learn more about supply-side economics here:

brainly.com/question/27626603

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the three-fifths compromise resolve this conflict?
    8·1 answer
  • Groups like CORE and SNCC used what strategy to protest segregation in restaurants?
    12·1 answer
  • Maya social structure
    15·1 answer
  • What effect did the platt amendment have on Cuban citizens
    9·2 answers
  • What promoted president Wilson to bring the United States into world war 1
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the Japanese resist occupation?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of following is the takeover of a weaker territory by a stronger nation in order to dominate it?​
    9·1 answer
  • Charlie gets in line to vote. It’s 1968 and he is 18 years old. When he gets to the front of the line, he is denied and told he
    12·1 answer
  • Which was part of the Populist Party's platform? (also known as the "People's Party")
    14·1 answer
  • NO LINKS PLEASE IM BEGGING
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!