This is a good article :>
The answer is <em>B) Students are feeling the affects of Jaylen's anti-bullying campaign. </em>
<em></em>
Answer:
c. by admitting that there are parts of his arguments that are harsh
Explanation:
When he know what the audience mught think and can infer form what he is saying, he tries to convince them by stating that he understands what the argument can cause in the reader, that he know that it can be a hard pill to swallow, but it has to be done and it has to be adressed.
I think the brainstorming method does C.
Yeah your argument is correct.
At 18 you can vote, the present-day youth are literate and enlightened and the lowering of the voting age would provide to the unrepresented youth of the country an opportunity to give vent to their feelings and help them become a part of the political process.
It is, therefore, proposed to reduce the voting age from 21 years to 18 years. Hence, the court argument is proved as wrong. 18 have the capability to vote.
Yaa I cloud but I’m to lazy
