Answer:
The reader knows that Mr. Pilkington is praising a flawed and brutal system.
Explanation:
Dramatic irony is when the audience or readers know something about the scene and would expect it to happen which the characters in the story or scene seem to have no idea. The speech and behavior of the characters will contradict the upcoming event, which the readers or viewers can predict but not by the characters in the story.
In the given excerpt from chapter 10 from “Animal Farm” by George Orwell, we see Mr. Pilkington give a speech about how much he and his human friends have regarded the way Animal Farm was run by Napoleon. He is seen praising the brutal system that was the basis of how the farm was run and also promised that he along with his fellow humans will institute the same system in their own farms. And through his speech,<u> we as readers, know that Mr. Pilkington was praising a system that is both brutal and flawed.
</u>
B is the answer to this question!
The type of parallel construction which is represented in the verse is synthetic parallelism structures.
What is synthetic parallelism?
The use of parallelism enhances the poem's meter and cadence and is prevalent in many of these poetry volumes. In Hebrew poetry, there are many different kinds of parallelism.
It advances a notion, which is the hallmark of synthetic parallelism. As opposed to synonymous parallelism, which uses synonymous repetition to strengthen a notion, this is not the same thing.
A framework with comparable elements that show a purposeful comparison, contrast, or association is referred to as parallel in poetry. The term "synthetic parallelism" refers to a number of different sorts of structures.
Additionally, to amplify a meaning, synthetic parallelism employs the phrase "better this, than that." Many of the lyrical works that offer wisdom lessons benefit from this format.
Learn more about synthetic parallelism
brainly.com/question/22618154
#SPJ4
<span>The
political unrest and economic instability of the 1920s and the 1970s
provided an opportunity for extreme political parties to blame
more-moderate political parties or the ruling government for either not
doing enough to solve the country’s issues or for causing the problems
in the first place. In both 1920s Germany and 1970s Cambodia, these
circumstances allowed these authoritarian groups, the Nazis and the
Khmer Rouge, to climb to power.</span>
Maybe singing that would be a good start.
