Secondary pollutants are more harmful than primary pollutants. False
<h3>Primary and secondary pollutants</h3>
Primary pollutants are pollutants released directly to the environment from their sources.
Secondary pollutants are formed from the reactions of primary pollutants with other substances in the environment.
Both primary and secondary pollutants can equally be harmful to living organisms. What distinguishes their harmful level would be the nature of the substance.
Thus, saying that secondary pollutants are more harmful than primary pollutants is not completely true.
More on pollutants can be found here: brainly.com/question/23857736
#SPJ1
The main difference between mammalian and reptilian teeth is that reptiles are usually homodont while mammals are typically heterodont. This means that all reptiles’ teeth are the same shape and on the other hand, mammals have different types of teeth, like incisors, canines, premolars, and molars. The advantage of mammalian teeth is in those difference in size and shape of teeth which results in their different function. Thus, mammalians are more efficient and specialized for different types of feeding.
This statement is false. If a factor is controlled and set to three levels, then it is clearly of interest to the researcher.
(Verified to be the correct answer through answering this question on my Statistics homework)
The answer is A.Transportation
Proteins have structural roles throughout the body. Carbohydrates are the major energy source for cells in the body. I am unsure if lipids or nucleic acids apply.
