Glittering generalizations are the poster's chosen persuasive strategy.A persuasive strategy used to emotionally appeal to the reader is to employ glitzy generalizations.
Glittering generalities are frequently utilized in advertising to create compelling pictures and verbiage.We can read the words "Ours...to fight for" in the World War II picture by Norman Rockwell. Liberation from Want. Then, cheerful individuals are seen feasting.The words and image were created with the intention of touching readers' emotions.
learn more about Glittering generalizations here:
brainly.com/question/25963361
#SPJ4
Answer:
2nd choice makes the most sence
Explanation:
Without wasting money, A., because many clothes that people think are "in style" are quite expensive, and people end up spending more than they make. They purchase too much, or purchase clothes with too high of a price, but they really don't actually need all of the clothes, so that counts as wasting. Also, depleting money can't be because that means deleting money, (how the heck are you gonna do that? :P), it's not spending money, because in order to get clothes, (or get fabric to MAKE clothes), you DO have to spend money in order to get it. Finally, WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU CONSUME MONEY?!?!? :P Consuming means eating, so why would you eat money, when you could use it to donate to the poor, or help feed hungry children, or even help pay for some supplies to build houses for homeless people?
Look, some advice from me is that instead of trying to "fit in", or be in the "latest style", you could really change someone's life and become popular for your good DEEDS, not for what you WEAR.
Be that change that you wish to see in this world.
I hope I helped! =D
