Answer:
B. Disjunction.
Explanation:
To answer this question we need to know what disjunction means.
<u>When two statements are connected with the word 'or', the new statement is called </u><u>a disjunction.</u><u> In other words, a disjunction is a compound sentence formed by using the word 'or' to join two simple sentences. </u>
As for other options:
- A conjunction is wrong because it would connect the statements with 'and'
- Conditional is wrong because it would connect the statements with 'if'
- The converse is wrong because it would connect the statements with 'no'.
I hope it helped you :)
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
Answer:
Don’t look down the entire time the other person is speaking is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Letter A is incorrect because it is a good idea to write down some notes so the person won't forget what he wants to say during his intervention.
C is also incorrect because the person shouldn't write everything, because it means that he should learn how to categorize what the other person says because not everything is important.
D is also incorrect because if Ren did so he would show that he need to improve his listening skills.
B is correct because this way Ren would show that he can both pay attention to the other person while writing. It would also mean that he can see what the other person is doing, since body language could be very important for the debate.
Answer: The first two women to graduate from U.S. Army Ranger School
Explanation: Kristen Griest was a platoon leader for the 4th Brigade Combat Team. AKA an airborne team. She became a ranger in 2015 and continued to fight for the U.S. Sadly, she was only a one-time pilot. Shaye Haver is also one of the first women to become an Army Ranger. She soon gained the 34th rank and earned the name of one of the world's greatest leaders. Did that help?
