Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
Answer:
The correct answer is (d)
Explanation:
Better quality can help to reduce many costs such as customer’s dissatisfaction cost, inspection cost and warrant and service cost. When customers don't like the quality of the product they are likely to buy the same product from somewhere else that is the dissatisfaction cost. Still, maintenance cost is likely to incur no matter how good the quality is. Maintenance cost helps to keep the product clean and fresh for long-term use.
Answer:
Explanation:
Ursula needs $19,000 or in other words FV (Future value)
She has savings of $2000 and trade in of $800 or in other words she has $2800. She needs to borrow $16200 (19000-2800)
Also, she wants monthly payment to be $282. To find which answer fits best, let's check each of them.
A) APR =78% or mothly rate of 78/12 = 6.5%; 48 months
Using financial calculator:
Rate = 6.5%
n = 48
PV = $16200
Find PMT? PMT = 11068
This is not the right answer
B) APR = 78%, monthly rate=6.5%
n = 60
PV = $16200
Find PMT? PMT = 1077.6
This is not the right answer
C) APR = 7.8%; monthly 0.65%
n =72
PV = $16200
Find PMT? PMT = 282.4
This is the correct option
Answer is - C
Answer:
8.66%
Explanation:
The computation of the rate of return for the investor in the fund is as follows:
= (Net assets at the end + dividend per share - nav at the beginning of the year) ÷ (nav at the beginning of the year)
where,
Net assets at the end is
= $203 million + $203 million × 7% - ($217.21 million × 0.75%)
= $203 million + $14.21 million - $1.6291 million
= $217.21 million - $1.6291 million
= $215.58093 million
Dividend per share is
= $5 million ÷ 10 million shares
= 0.5
Nav at the beginning of the year is
= $203 million ÷ 10 million shares
= $20.3
Now the rate of return is
= ($215,.58093 + 0.5 - $20.3) ÷ ($20.3)
= 8.66%
Answer:
Direct material price variance= $2,500 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The standards for each cap allow 2.00 yards of soft for $2.00 per yard. During January, the company purchased 25,000 yards of soft fabric at $2.10 per yard, to produce 12,000 caps.
<u>To calculate the direct material price variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Direct material price variance= (2 - 2.1)*25,000
Direct material price variance= $2,500 favorable
