All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements about renting and owning is correct

Business

2 answers:

il63 [147K]3 years ago

8 0

d. is the correct option.

Both renter and owner has responsibilityfor renting and owning.

Further explanation:

Renting and owning:

Renting is paying someone for their property or land for the use of their land or house or anything. And owning is having something of our own or the ownership of any asset or land, property or anything.

Justification for the correct and incorrect answer:

a. Renter complete responsibility and control over the property:This option is incorrect.

This statement is not true as owner has the control over the property and renter is not all alone have the control and the responsibility for the property. The renter and the owner possess equal control and responsibility for the property.

b. An owner has complete responsibility and control over property:This option is incorrect.

The statement says that an owner has complete responsibility and control over the property which is not correct as the owner and renter both have the responsibility and the control over the property.

c. Neither a renter or owner has responsibility: This option is incorrect.

The statement says that neither therenter or the owner has responsibility which is absolutely incorrect as both the owner and the renter have the responsibility for the property.

d. Both renter and owner has responsibility: This option is correct.

The statement says that both renter and the owner have the responsibility for the property is correct as renter and owner both possess equal rights over the property.

Thus, the renter and the owner possess equal rights for the property. Renter and owner both are responsible for the property.

Learn more:

1. Learn more about choosing the purchase of car or leasing

brainly.com/question/2731676

2. Learn more about choosing the purchase of the car

brainly.com/question/1258129

3. Learn more about renting and owning

brainly.com/question/2288011

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Business studies

Chapter: Renting and owning

Keywords: which of the following, statements about renting and owning is correct,renter complete responsibility and control over the property, an owner has complete responsibility and control over property, neither a renter or owner has responsibility, both renter and owner has responsibility, control, posses.

kow [346]3 years ago

4 0

Hi,

The question asks which of the following statements about renting and owning is correct:

a. renter complete responsibility and control over the property
b. an owner has complete responsibility and control over property
c. neither a renter or owner has responsibility
d. both renter and owner has responsibility

a. and c. are definitely incorrect, b. is not entirely correct.

The correct, true option is option d. Both the renter and the owner share responsibility and control over the property.

Faith xoxo

You might be interested in

Why had farming become unprofitable during this period?

vivado [14]

If you are referring to the unprofitable farming that occurred during the period of populism, then the answer is that it became unprofitable because the crops were producing surpluses and the prices started dropping heavily.

8 0

2 years ago

Simon Company's year-end balance sheets follow. Current Yr 1 Yr Ago 2 Yrs Ago At December 31 Assets Cash Accounts receivable, ne

weqwewe [10]

Answer:

1a. Current ratio = Current assets / Current Liabilities

Current year = $224,517 / $120168 = 1.88 : 1

1 years ago = $175,652 / $70,310 = 2.50 : 1

2 years ago =$134,088 / $44,840 = 2.99 : 1

1b. The Current ratio worse over three years period

2a. Acid test ratio = (Cash + Investment + Account Receivables) / Current liabilities

Current year = ($29,328 + $0 + $83,351) / $120,168 = 0.94 : 1

1 year ago = ($32,285 + $0 + $57,663) / $70,310 = 1.28 : 1

2 year ago = ($34,323 + $0 + $45,764) / $44,840 = 1.79 : 1

2b. The Acid test ratio are worse over three years period

8 0

2 years ago

Nelson Mfg. owns a manufacturing facility that is currently sitting idle and is debt-free. The facility is located on a piece of

rodikova [14]

Answer:

The total cost to include in any project analysis should be $1,700,000, which can be apportioned as follows:

Land = $159,000/$617,000 * $1,700,000 = $438,088

Facility = $458,000/$617,000 * $1,700,000 = $1,261,912

Explanation:

The fair market values of the Land and Facility are $438,088 and $1,261,912, being the amounts at which the land and facility could be sold together to obtain $1,700,000.

In project analysis, the relevant cost to include is not the sunk cost of $617,000 ($159,000 and $458,000), but the opportunity cost.

$1,700,000 represents the opportunity cost.

The opportunity cost is the cost that would have been incurred assuming that the land and facility were sold at the first bid. This represents the bid price for the land and facility.

5 0

2 years ago

The Petit Chef Co. has 11.6 percent coupon bonds on the market with ten years left to maturity. The bonds make annual payments a

olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

14.5

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Candice tells Yuri that she wants to hear his ideas about the Q4 Finance Report, and Yuri says that they should compare it to la

Sloan [31]

Arrogantly

Explanation:

What Candice is saying here basically boils down to 'we don't need to compare this to last year's performance as I want to see positive results not negatives' insinuating that the performance has become worse in the last year.

Regressions in a financial report mean weaker performance over the fiscal year while projections mean that the performance was better.

4 0

3 years ago