The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
That is in fact true. The Articles appointed no executive and therefore had a problem enforcing laws.
Answer:
The battle for North Africa was a struggle for control of the Suez Canal and access to oil from the Middle East and raw materials from Asia. ... Oil in particular had become a critical strategic commodity due to the increased mechanization of modern armies.
The reservation system gave indigenous people freedom and allowed them to keep some of their cultural and social traditions.
(I hope this helps)
