The correct answer for this question is "a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions." The statement that best describes consensus historiography is that it is <span>a re-interpretation of facts based on new evidence and resulting in new conclusions.</span>
A. Because the Egypt and Indus valley are in the desert, living near a river gave access to a food supply, water and better soil for growing crops. There were better resources to build shelter, and the river provided a safe route of transportation to other areas.
With rights, come responsibilities<span>. Jurors owe it to their fellow citizens to perform this service seriously; justice depends all on the quality of jurors who </span>serve<span>. The survival of your own right to trial by </span>jury<span> depends on the willingness of all to </span>serve<span>, so be part of the system and make a difference.</span>
The Cognitive Dissonance theory best accounts for his attitudinal shift.
What is Cognitive Dissonance?
In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the perception of contradictory information. Relevant items of information include a person's actions, feelings, ideas, beliefs, values, and things in the environment.
Another common example of cognitive dissonance is the rationalization that takes place when people dieting “cheat.” How many times have you committed to healthy eating when a doughnut, muffin, or another delicious-looking food item threatened to take you off course? Maybe you thought, “Eh, it's only one doughnut.
Signs you might be experiencing cognitive dissonance include:
- General discomfort without a distinct or obvious cause.
- Feeling conflicted regarding a contentious issue.
- People accusing you of hypocrisy.
- Being conscious of opposing opinions and/or wanted, yet unsure about how to handle them.
Learn more about cognitive dissonance here:
brainly.com/question/11732168
#SPJ4
upper Mississippi river is the answer
