It is called False Authority. This is utilizing an expert as confirmation in your contention when the specialist isn't generally an expert on the certainties significant to the contention. As the crowd, enabling an insignificant specialist to add validity to the claim being made.
I found this I don’t know if it helps
It's called separation of powers.
Your correct answer would be D.
It's the practical-ish solution for individuals seeking monetary remedies too low in proportion to attorney fees, and requiring more legally binding enforcement measures than those provided by mediation/arbitration. The ish suffix indicates that it's not the democratized "people's court" that everyone thinks it is... We've found that it's not very useful for low-income, immigrant or shy folks which either don't feel confident enough, or are so ensnared by the legal system that they never think small claims court a viable solution for their problems.
<span>It also plays a great entertainment role, apparently, given the popularity of daytime shows such as that of the assertive Mrs. Judge Judy.</span>
