Incomplete question. However, I assumed you are referring to the article <em>"An Inspector Calls and J B Priestley’s political journey" </em>by Alison Cullingford.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In that article the five words that Cullingford uses to describe the ‘golden age' were:
- freedom,
- plenty,
- hospitality,
- conviviality,
- generosity.
He uses such words in other to highlight the contrasts between past experiences and the present one in which Bradford found himself.
Answer:
A warrior <u>frightens</u> a gruesome monster <u>away.</u>
Explanation:
When you complete a sentence you have to make sure that the combination o verb and predicate are compatible, and that they express in the best possible way what you are trying to say. So let's analyze the answers:
1) frightens; away: this is grammatically correct, and both words combine well and add meaning to the message.
2) splits; in half: this is grammatically incorrect, it would have to be "into halves" or "in two"
3) kills; forever: kills already implies is forever, it is repetitive
4)beats; in pieces: beats doesn't imply that the monster was split into pieces, so these two words don't combine.
Marriage was the only means for women to gain social mobility
You are really enough
This is really dangerous
Raining rapidly in US
I am eating outside
This may have advantages
