I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
Thomas Paine's book, Common Sense, supported independence of the North American colonies.
He said that it was common sense that the colonists should be free of their former masters because now they were a new country/continent and had to take care of themselves. The other options have nothing to do with this pamphlet.
<span>That seems quite obvious. The world arguably benefits even today because of its effects. Examples of the positive outcome are the introduction of new fruits and vegetation such as banana, coffee, wheat, orange, peach, and rice to the New World, and beans, cocoa, corn, tomato, and potato to the Old World. This spread of agriculture led to a greater surplus of varieties of food and boosted the world’s population.</span>
