Hey there!
I believe these are the followings:
The defendant pleads guilty to the charges at his arraignment.
<span>The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law. </span>
<span>The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode. </span>
<span>The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
</span>
The statement that is true about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode is that the teacher testified that Goode would not break the law
Hope this helps!:)
Answer:
In 1651, parliament passed and imposed the "Navigation Acts" on colonies in the New World. These laws were passed to increase taxes on products shipped into the colonies and materials exported. But it also further restricted trade with foreign countries. Britain used Mercantilism to gain wealth from its colonies and heavily taxed them. But these are key points on how it would further affect trade.
- The Navigation Acts were passed in the 17th and 18th centuries to force colonial trade to favor England and prevent colonial trade with the Netherlands, France, and other European countries.
- The first of the Navigation Acts was passed in 1651 as a response to the Dutch trade wars and consequent devastation of British trade.
- The first Act reinforced a longstanding government principle that English trade should be carried in English vessels; later acts further restricted the trade practices of the colonies in order to increase England’s profit.
- The Acts required all of a colony’s imports to be either bought from England or resold by English merchants in England, regardless of what price could be obtained elsewhere.
- The Navigation Acts, while enriching Britain, caused resentment in the colonies and were a major contributing factor to the American Revolution, fueled by the later Molasses and Sugar Acts.
<u><em>Hope this answer helped!</em></u>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
France had all of these things, and after the revolution this burden was a thorn in Frances side for decades.
Answer:
A im pretty sure
Explanation:
Proponents explain the rise of modern human DNA from a continuous exchange of genetic material occurred over a span of hundreds of thousands of years. The Out of Africa theory describes a much simpler and recent evolution of modern humans, moving from Africa to Eurasia and then globally.
