The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach further references, a text, an excerpt, or something else in order to know Wiebe's argument.
However, trying to help you, we did some deep research and can comment on the following.
Historian Robert H. Weibe published the "Search for Order" in which he commented on the scope of the Progressivist movement and its main reformers. He said that the heart of the progressivist movement relied on the ambition of the middle class to pursue its goals.
One example from the period 1880 to 1920 that could be used to support Wiebe's argument could be the reformer's goal to "clean" the government of corruption reported by muckraker journalists, the modernization of the American education system, and the support of the right of women to vote.
When the Age of Exploration began, there were many reasons European countries wanted to explore. France's motive to explore was similar to that of Spain and England because All the three countries wanted to win as many new converts to their religion as possible.
<h3>What is age of exploration?</h3>
Exploration is the term used to refer to the movement of people to new region to discover what is there, where the age of exploration is a time period where most people are involved in the exploration. the age of exploration is mid 15th and 16th century.
This period is also called the age of discovery. The European countries discovered many routes sea and land that enables trade. this period king John II discovered two routes to Egypt. First by land then the other by other by land.
The exploration is done for several reasons and religion is one of them. Peculiar to this question France, Spain, and England wanted to win as many new converts to their religion as possible.
Read more on age of exploration here: brainly.com/question/2627006
#SPJ!
Where are the following? Lol
Answer:to describe honors for the slave trade
Explanation:
I guessed and it was right lol
Calhoun, who opposed the federal imposition of the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 and argued that the U.S. Constitution gave states the right to block the enforcement of a federal law. In November 1832 South Carolina adopted the Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state.
