Answer:
naysayers means someone who opposes something, or disagrees
Explanation:
In the film Miss Evers' Boys, several of the now-existing APA guidelines are violated to the extreme. The movie, which illustrates the Tuskegee Study conducted by a group of southern doctors in 1932, tells the story of a group of African-American men who are being unknowingly studied to see if untreated syphilis reacts the same way in African-Americans that it does in white men. At first, treatment is given to them but once the funds for the study are cut and treatment is no longer made available for 14,000 men, the study goes on without them knowing they have stopped receiving medicine. Miss Evers is told that once the government realizes they have continued the study, they will likely re-obtain funds within a year but the study goes on for ten additional years without treatment. The affected men are simply given placebos and then observed. They are also given spinal taps (which are referred to as "back shots" so the men will think they are part of the treatment.) Even though penicillin becomes available, they are refused administration of such because of a rumor that it could kill them and the fact that the doctors do not want the results of the study being tampered with. Most of the men die, and some go crazy; very few are left alive at the end of a ten-year period. The end result is that yes, untreated syphilis affects both African-Americans and whites alike.
Today, the APA has many guidelines which would prevent The Tuskegee Study or anything like it from ever taking place again. In chapter 8 of the APA Ethics Code, 8.07 deals with deception in research, which is mainly what made the Tuskegee Study so unethical.
Part A states that "Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible." The doctors conducting the Tuskegee...
Answer:
It's most likely a statistic because it's listing numbers and sales. I wouldn't say fact because it's not something most people know.
Answer:
True is the correct answer.
Explanation:
It is true that a key benefit of taking a public speaking class is learning how to think critically and analyze information carefully.
Research shows that students who take a one-semester public speaking course experience less fear, partly because they are more accustomed to the speech technique, which has allowed them to exercise critical thought and thorough information analysis.
It is possible to think critically by actively evaluating data to determine the best course of action.
It is impossible to emphasize the value of critical thinking in public speaking. Using critical thinking, we can assess the truth or plausibility of an argument.
But it also helps with the development of strong speeches. By applying critical thinking techniques throughout the entire speech preparation and delivery process, we could avoid a lot of issues. Critical thinking does not happen by magic.
To learn more about public speaking here
brainly.com/question/10454613
#SPJ4
