Answer:
a.) psychiatric research
Explanation:
A research based on psychology is carried out with the sole purpose of analyzing the behavior of an individual or a group of individuals, based on their overall experiences. In this case, the research is also based on analyzing patients to see who is the best fir to participate in a community service project
Indeed, most economists would argue that the best interests of international businesses are served by a <u>free-trade stance</u>.
<h3>What is a free-trade stance?</h3>
A free-trade stance is a government policy that does not restrict imports and exports because there are no import tariffs or export subsidies.
A free-trade stance is also known as laissez-faire policy because under a free-trade policy, goods and services are exchanged across international borders with little or no government interventions in the forms of tariffs, quotas, subsidies, or prohibitions.
Trade protectionism, which creates economic isolationism, is the direct opposite of the concept of free trade.
Thus, indeed, most economists would argue that the best interests of international businesses are served by a <u>free-trade stance</u>.
Learn more about the free-trade stance at brainly.com/question/10608502
Answer:
a. Trade can make every person better off.
Explanation:
Trade generates a benefit for all parties trading. If a party do not fell like winning with trade, it will stop trading and the trade will not occur. It is important for each party to make sure the other wants to keep trading, so quantity and price will be based upon both parties agreement.
A person can trade for product she produces, for example a person who produce a certain fruit can buy the same fruit when is off-station in their side of the world with another producer.
It could also trade becasue is the raw material of a finished product and it need more input for his facilities.
If a person or a party who is trading thinks is worse than before the trade, then it will stop trading so, as long as there is trade, both parties are better off after the trade.
Answer:
In this scenario, <u>LISA</u> has both an absolute advantage in food preparation, and <u>LISA</u> has a comparative advantage in food preparation.
Assume that initially, Sam and Lisa are splitting both tasks for a large number of events. Then they decide to start shifting some work according to the principle of comparative advantage. In particular, the person with the comparative advantage in food preparation will take over preparing food for one more event, and the other person will use the freed-up time to get more clients. As a result, the total number of events for which food is prepared will remain unchanged, but the number of new clients will increase by <u>1</u>.
Before they were getting 3 new customers since Sam got 2 and Lisa 1, but since Sam will only look for clients, then the total number of clients will be 4 (or 1 more).
Explanation:
It takes Sam 12 hours to prepare the food for an event and 3 hours of effort to get each new client.
- Sam's opportunity cost of preparing food = 12/3 = 4 new clients
- Sam's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 3/12 = 0.25 of food preparation
For Lisa, it takes 10 hours to prepare food for an event and 5 hours to get a new client.
- Lisa's opportunity cost of preparing food = 10/5 = 2 new clients
- Lisa's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 5/10 = 0.5 of food preparation
B being featured on the evening news
