Answer:
$70000
Explanation:
We have been give in this question that a 100 percent of FORcos share belongs to piper. He owns a 100 percent fully. Piper has to include that which he deposited. 7 million dollars of 2 percent
= 7million dollars x 1 percent
= 7000000 x 0.01
= $70000
So piper has to include in gross income her share of FORcos f income for investment in united states property and this has been calculated as 70000
Answer:
C. Variable inflation is associated with high transaction costs
Explanation:
Because of uncertainty about future inflation, it may not uncertain relative to its price change. Therefore, option A is not correct.
In order to maximize financial position, inflation harms borrowers and helps lenders, so option B is also incorrect.
Option C is correct because variable inflation is associated with high transaction costs in order to maximize the financial position. For example, if the inflation rate is 5% during first quarter, the price level is not much to disrupt the financial position. Again, in the next quarter, if the inflation rate changes to 4%, the position will be effective more. However, if it increases, it will not affect too much.
Answer:
4%
Explanation:
The Gordon constant growth dividend model =
Value = dividend / cost of capital - growth rate
Subsisting with the values given in the question gives :
25 = 2.5/0.14 - g
To solve for g,
1. multiply both sides by 0.14 - g
25(0.14 -g) = 2.5
2. divide both sides by 25
0.14 - g = 0.10
g = 0.04 = 4%
Answer:
ii) Average revenue equals $10
Explanation:
A perfectly competitive market is where there are many buyers and sellers of homogenous goods. They are price takers. Price = marginal cost = marginal revenue = average revenue
Total revenue = price × quantity sold
$500 = price × 50
Price = $10
Average revenue = Total revenue / output
$500 / 50 = $10
In a franchise, the franchisor allows the franchisee to trade under its name and see its products for a fee The franchisee pays an original fee to franchisor and a
percentage of its profit for the privilege.So,since, Dunkin' Doughnuts is sharing its' brand name and image with David Ungar(his franchisee) it would definately want to improve it...at the least maintain it...David too is right on the other hand as there can be a possibility that he wants to use ingredients of a much higher quality than that provided.But dunkin' doughnuts can't still allow to do that as it has other franchisees to look after.Imagine that=>all the franchisees of dunkin' doughnuts use different ingredients with different quality..wouldn't this affects the image of the franchisor...also all the food items they sell will have a different taste depending on the ingredients.And if one of the franchisee buys cheap ingredients... thereby producing low quality out put ..the customers will not be satisfied...this will not only affect that franchisee but also the Brand image of the whole business worldwide.
To conclude,David may not be wrong with his idea but since dunkin' doughnuts is a big business with a good brand image...it has its' terms and requirements.