Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
below are the choices that should accompanied your question above the answer is D.
<span>a. corporate responses to changes in the business environment
b. assessment of competitors strengths
c. identification of customer needs
d. development of core competencies</span>
Answer:
I believe it it the second option.
Explanation:
Answer:
$33.33
Explanation:
The computation of the predetermined overhead rate is shown below: In this question, we have to apply the formula that is presented below:
Predetermined overhead rate = (Total estimated overhead) ÷ (estimated direct labor-hours)
= $2,500,000 ÷ 75,000 direct labors hours
= $33.33
Simply we divide the anticipates total overhead by the anticipated direct labor hours
Answer:
i would say b , but im not 100% sure, good luck!
Explanation:
