1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andru [333]
2 years ago
6

HELP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

History
2 answers:
neonofarm [45]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I believe it is king James

9966 [12]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

King james I think because everyone else went

You might be interested in
Do you think that informal changes to the constitution are as important as formal amendments? Explain Why.
Vladimir79 [104]
A "Formal Amendment" is one that actually adds to or changes the US Constitution. It is ratified by the states and becomes law. 

<span>An "informal amendment"is a change to the meaning or interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. There is no real informal way to change the Constitution, and it's not an actual change to the wording of the Constitution; rather, it's the way we perceive the Constitution that changes. </span>

<span>The one that comes to mind is the equal rights amendment (1972) - which prohibits the inequality of men and women. Opponents say that the amendment is no longer needed, as the issues are already law</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Why do some states require an ID to vote​
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

bc some states have to check the id to see if you are from there

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was the first major overhaul of the __________'s communications policy in nearly 62 years
mafiozo [28]

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the first major overhaul of telecommunications law in almost 62 years. This new rule aims to open up all communications businesses to everyone, allowing them to compete in any market against one another.

What was the main result of the Telecommunications Act of 1996?

The measure drastically lowered restrictions on cross-ownership and media concentration. Deregulation reduced competition and made it possible for businesses like AOL/Time Warner and Viacom to acquire several media outlets in local communities.

What did the Telecommunications Act of 1966 do?

The purpose of the law, according to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), was to "let anyone enter any communications business - to let any communications business compete in any market against any other." Deregulation of the convergent broadcasting and telecommunications markets was the main objective of the legislation.

Learn more about Telecommunications Act of 1966: brainly.com/question/3364707

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
Take a position on whether you believe the right to privacy should be guaranteed to all citizens and what limits if any, should
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

obviously yes yelling fire in a crowded theater is morally wrong. but I do believe that there are certain guidelines as to what you can and cannot say in public. such as slurs. and things like this.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the port of Kilwa help build the golden city of Great Zimbabwe?
    12·1 answer
  • In the mid-1800s, western settlers and american indians differed in their views about?
    8·2 answers
  • Why is it useful for historians to craft historical narratives
    5·1 answer
  • Which group of people were allowed to fight for the british during the american revolution in exchange for their freedom when th
    8·1 answer
  • Why where troop sent overseas knew they were likely to be killed in the fighting
    8·1 answer
  • Read Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not. Do you agree or disagree with the author and why.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these was an advantage of the U.S. military in the Battle of
    15·1 answer
  • In the poem "Landing of the Pilgrim Fathers in New England", the poet presents the issues of freedom and difficulty. What did th
    14·1 answer
  • The dispute over the Oregon boundary was between:
    6·1 answer
  • Helppppppppppppppppppp
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!