1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir1956 [14]
3 years ago
6

What is meant by the statement, “Rights are not absolute”? Give an example of a right that is not absolute, and explain why this

is so.
History
1 answer:
algol [13]3 years ago
3 0

                                                    <u>Answer</u>

<em>They are intended to illustrate that no right available to an individual or group is or can be absolute. The reality that human rights are not absolute, and are subject to reasonable restrictions, does not mean that the rights can be arbitrarily curtailed according to legislative or bureaucratic discretion.</em>

<em>Hope this helps! <3</em>

You might be interested in
Who is responsible for creating the great compromise
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

Donald Trump

Explanation:

How is it

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind of powers are given to both the states and national government?
Artyom0805 [142]
 they are given concurrent powers.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A
svp [43]
The answer is D.) County Commissioners Trust me

Good luck;)
8 0
2 years ago
19. Which of the following countries had the least impact in Asia *
tresset_1 [31]

Answer: Portugal.

Explanation:

Intensive colonization of Asia began during the XIX. century. The largest colonizing empire in history, Great Britain controlled most of the territory. Hong Kong, Burma, Malaya, North Borneo came under British rule. The French controlled Indochina's territory, while the Dutch were the third most important European colonizing factor. The Dutch established their colonies in what is now Indonesia.

5 0
3 years ago
Why where 1960 race riots more violent in the north cities compared to the south
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Because in the south, there had been small riots for years, whereas in the north, there was a series of very large riots because the north had not previously had riots. The south had continuously been having smaller riots for years before and after (Including lynching, murder of African Americans, and attacks on black businesses, etc.)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which started the French and Indian war
    15·2 answers
  • Which advantages did the British have over the colonists during the American war for independence? They were battling on their h
    8·2 answers
  • Urgent! please answer these
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP ASL EXAM!!! WILL GIVE BRAIN! Ever since the 1988 protest at Gallaudet University
    5·2 answers
  • Which two countries are demarcated by the demilitarized zone? (Select all that apply.)
    13·2 answers
  • Determine one positive and one negative example from the Mexican Constitution and describe why.
    13·1 answer
  • Which conqueror came to Chile?<br><br> Pizzaro<br> Magellan<br> de Gama<br> Columbus
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the Catholic church stay powerful even though the crusades were a failure?
    11·1 answer
  • what an action that members of the public who disagree with the holdings in district of columbia v. Heller could take to limits
    6·1 answer
  • What was one of the first inventions that made it possible to communicate almost instantly over long distances?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!