Answer:
How did the constitution guard against Tyranny?
Explanation:
Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
Answer:
Bail: Money or property promised or given to the court as security when a defendant is released before and during trial with the agreement he will return to court when ordered.
Explanation: plz mark brainlist
Answer:
Legally, representatives of the Electoral College have the right to vote as they like and for whom they want, ignoring the results of popular vote in their states. State governments, for their part, have the power to impose monetary fines and, in some states, to revoke such votes. The general situation was clarified by the Supreme Court in 1954 in the ruling in Ray v. Blair. It was clarified that the states and parties to which the electors belong have the right to demand from them a preliminary “pledge to vote” and provide for actions in case of violation of such an oath, but they cannot prosecute electors in the framework of criminal procedure of the Code for breaking such an oath.
Now, the Supreme Court places emphasis on the protection of the popular will, which gives voters the task of voting for the required candidates. If this were not the case and the voters chose with absolute freedom which candidate to vote for, the popular will would be severely impaired and the voters would be practically the only voters who would define the destiny of the federal government.
Answer: It was the Fugitive Slave Law.
Explanation: It was the Fugitive Slave Law. Indeed, it forced the federal and judicial authorities of Free states to aid Southern officials or slave owners to capture fugitive runaway slaves or be fined of $1000 dollars if they refused. It also forced citizens of Free states to participate in a posse to capture the fleeing slave if ordered to do so by federal marshals. Even Free blacks could be arrested as runaway slaves if a southern slave owner claimed property over them.
