Well, it depends what action the baby is doing, but if i was guessing by common sense, i would think Gabe, because he is 20 months old
<span>They will be sentenced more harshly than whites in
"</span>
less serious cases".
The liberation hypothesis contends that the impacts of additional lawful factors, for
example, victim or potentially guilty party race on condemning results are
molded by legitimately significant components, especially the seriousness or
the quality of the case. The theory was first proposed by Harry Kalven and Hans
Zeisel in the book named "The American Jury".
Drive theories of motivation are often described as PUSH
Theories. In push motivation theory, a person is motivated to make an effort to
move in order to be away of unwanted situation. In this theory it shows that a motivation
is being brought up in order to avoid unwanted results.
Zoey has learned this concept of conservation. It refers to the logical thinking ability that enables a person to determine that a certain quantity will remain constant despite changes in the container, shape, or apparent size.
More about conservation theory:
The third stage in Piaget's theory of cognitive development is the concrete operational stage. This stage lasts from seven to eleven years and is marked by the development of organised and rational thinking.
Because it marks the beginning of logical or operational thought, Piaget (1954a) considered the concrete stage to be a major turning point in the child's cognitive development. The child is now old enough to use logical reasoning or operations.
Conservation is the understanding that something's quantity remains constant even if its appearance changes. This can apply to things like volume, number, and area.
To be more specific, conservation is the understanding that redistributing material has no effect on its mass, number, volume, or length.
Learn more about concrete operational stage here:
brainly.com/question/16460917
#SPJ4
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.
