Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.
Explanation:
The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.
Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.
What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).
In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.
In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.
Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.
Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.
Answer:
Montezuma treated the strangers on the coast like gods and accordingly gave them vast expensive gifts, due to their pale skin and the way that they had landed on the coast.
I believe the correct answer is wartime actions. Freedom of speech can be limited or restricted in cases involving <span>wartime actions. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions. Thank you.</span>
The economical boost of selling of cotton lead to the cotton gin being created during this period of time. Unfortunately, more cotton being produced meant more slaves being needed.
Answer:
If I could change anything in the world, I would change the government system. This is because the government rules more minor subjects like school, transportation, economics, and more. By changing the government system, these subjects will also slowly start to get better for all citizens. Some of the problems many people are facing are trouble in school, money bills, etc. These problems can come to a stop only when the governors decide to fix them. A realistic way we can fix this problem is by kicking some governors (who didn't help the nation for the better) and giving much more reliable and wiser people the position. These kinds of people will listen to their citizens and help out as much as they can. If chaos starts happening, people should go on a peaceful protest to get what they want. This would make the world a much better place as many problems will slowly start going away.
<em>Hope this helped :)</em>
