Answer:
influences on our own behavior
Explanation:
Actor-observer bias is a psychological term used to refer to the attribution of justifications to one's own behaviors and motivations and the people around them. Through the actor-observer bias, we get more information about the influences of the environment and other people about our behavior and the way we act in society.
Answer:
The correct answer is ''continuous reinforcement''
Explanation:
We consider a program to be one of continuous reinforcement as long as each and every emission of the target behavior receives reinforcement. In continuous reinforcement, each of the responses gives rise to the appearance of a reinforcer, that is, if in operant conditioning we administer the reinforcing stimulus whenever the subject emits the response that we want to condition, we have a continuous reinforcement program. That is, in an experimental condition, each time the desired or studied behavior is carried out, it will result in the arrival of the reinforcer.
Answer: Supplementary motor area.
Explanation: The supplementary motor area occupies the posterior one third of the superior frontal gyrus and is responsible for planning of complex movements. Also the control of movements that are internally generated rather than triggered by sensory events, and the control of sequences of movements.
Answer:
To support any claim, we need evidence that is in favor. And they are the arguments and explanations that best supports the claim. And those which does not supports the claim, leave the claim uncertain. And different debates will have a different list of evidence and reasons which support, and also a list that does not support the claim. Hence, first find the issue, which is the claim, and then find out what supports and what does not support the claim. And then you can put your words forward. That is the correct way to participate in a healthy debate. Remember, you should either support the claim, or you should be against the claim. And you will have to stick to it till the very end, supporting it with your thoughts and evidence that you can collect while preparing for the debate. The better you prepare, the healthier it is going to be the debate. And you should never be 50-50. You should either agree or disagree. Like if you are debating on climate change, you can either support it or not support it. The bushfire in Australia is a fact that supports, and you can pick it up if you are supporting, and economic loss is a fact that does not support it. You can pick that fact if you do not support it. The point is, you should put forward strong facts, And that makes a debate healthier.
Explanation:
Please check the answer.