Roman confederation gave the people more rights and allowed them to have their culture.
Explanation:
Roman confederation and the eventual empire that became from it had one very different purpose fro the others in that it did not differentiate with the new citizens of the country who had come in by conquest.
Instead all they had to do was pay taxes and recognize themselves as roman citizen.
They could keep speaking their language and worshiping their religion as well as have abilities to control and garner wealth in certain alliances too making it good to be a roman citizen for them.
Many people were able to move closer to their jobs
Answer: innovations
Culture is the all the practices and traditions shared by a certain society. Culture differs from one society to another. . Culture is passed through from one generation to another. Every society has a different set of values, symbolization, religion and perception on how they see things.There is nothing right or wrong about culture because it is diversity among different societies.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the previous link was not attached, we can say the following.
The central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source are the following,
A primary resource comes from the people who witnessed the event, the incident, or the specific moment. These people could have written their own descriptions, testimonies, books, or maybe journalists that directly reported what happened. It also could be an interview with people who were part of the historical event. For instance, if it is a soldier that participated in the Vietnam War, a journalist can interview him and use it as a primary source.
On the other hand, secondary sources can be obtained from other sources that were not direct. This could be an author that based its story in other investigations, or it could be encyclopedias.
Answer: D is correct.
Explanation: laws of reason are mere fictions. Philosophy of rights is dedicated to this issue but in its very fundaments there are fundamental questions that are still not answered (becase both laws of nature and laws of reason are products of human intellect, i.e. they cannot be experimentally proved. In spite of its fictitious nature, theese laws became one of the pillars of Enlightenment. French philophers, for example, attempted to ground ethics on mathematics which proved to be inviable.
