Answer:
The expected profit from the addition is $47,000
Explanation:
Total Addition can be calculated by netting expected values of all situations as follow:
Expected value = %Chance x additional Profit/loss
i Expected profit = 50% x $100,000 = $50,000
ii Expected profit = 30% x $0 = $0 (Profit is same there is no addition)
iii Expected profit = 20% x ($15,000) = ($3,000)
The expected profit from the addition = $50,000 + ($3,000) = $47,000
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
Debiting salaries Expense $400 and Crediting Salaries payable $400.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
We are given;
1 employees earns $ 100 a day
Therefore;
2 employees will earn $ 200 a day
The month ends on Tuesday, but the two employees works on Monday and Tuesday.
- Therefore, the month-end adjusting entry to record will be the amount earned by the two employees on the two days.
Two employees for 2 days = $200/day × 2 days
= $400
- But, salary is an expense, and in the accounts an increase in expense account is debited.
- According to the rule of double entry, an increase in salaries expense decreases the salaries payable. Therefore, we debit salaries expense account and credit salaries payable account.
- Therefore, the month-end adjusting entry to record the salaries earned but unpaid would be;
Debiting salaries Expense $400 and Crediting Salaries payable $400.
Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
