1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex777 [14]
3 years ago
14

Contrast thomas jefferson's policy to assimilate american indians in the 1780s with andrew jackson's policy of removing cherokee

s to west of the mississippi in the 1830s.
History
2 answers:
cestrela7 [59]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>The policy of Thomas Jefferson was to never remove native Americans whereas Andrew Jackson’s policy was to negotiate with native Americans for removal to federal territory.  </u></em>

Further Explanation:

<u>Thomas Jefferson was always of a view that Native American people were as equal as whiteman.  He never removed any native Indian Americans but also had a view that Lands of Indians were destined to be taken over from White people.</u> While serving as the President of United States, Jefferson always had a view that Americans need to respect Brotherhood and trade with native Americans and he also believed that the making them adopt style of European culture and also modes of living will allow them quickly in order to progress their style of living. He always thought that Indians had Spare lands and they would willingly exchange those lands in return of food or money. <u>On the other hand, President Andrew Jackson came up with Indian Removal Act in 1830 and this law gave access to the President to do negotiation with native American tribes for their removal from ancestral lands and in exchange they would get the part of federal territory which was a part of west Mississippi river. </u>The native Americans strongly opposed this act but this act got the support of southern and northeastern population. The Native Americans and Cherokees worked together to stop this relocation but all their efforts were unsuccessful.  

Learn more:

1. German scientists were concerned about nazi restrictions on uranium sales because? brainly.com/question/6943726

2. The believed in a loose construction of the constitution? brainly.com/question/621702

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Relocation of Native Americans

Keywords: Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Native Americans, Relocation, Mississippi, Federal Land, Cherokees, European culture, Food, land.

Lostsunrise [7]3 years ago
7 0
<span>Jefferson initially said that Native Americans were capable of assimilating to American culture. However, some of his private letters note that he was in agreement with the forced removal of the Native Americans to the lands west of the Mississippi. Jackson was the one credited with the removal of Native Americans to these parts due to the Indian Removal Act. However, he was carrying out a plan that Jefferson initiated.</span>
You might be interested in
Napoleon said: “When we fight, no matter in what country, it is a civil war we make.” Do you agree with him? If yes or no why? U
vladimir2022 [97]

This line is part of the “Military Maxims of Napoleon”, a collection of tenets on the art of war which are still an inspiration for military students. Through this line, he makes his war beliefs and tactics clear. We should also consider the meaning of civil war: it is a war which if fought between different groups of people (different in religion, political ideas, etc) of the same territory. Having this in mind we can mention for example The Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815). They consisted in a series of battles between France and other European powers, financed and usually led by the United Kingdom. Among these we can mention The Battle of Waterloo 1815, the Battle of Trafalgar 1805, etc.

I agree in the sense that inevitably whenever there is a war there are 2 groups of a different nature, sharing the territory but fighting for a reason. I also believe that the “civil war they make wherever they fight” does not necessarily imply military participation. Nowadays, we see many countries, mainly Latin American ones, in which the different economic and political conflicts (“wars”) produce a gap and a clash between different national or local groups (“civil war”).


6 0
3 years ago
Under the terms of the Embargo Act passed by Congress:
slavikrds [6]

I think its A hope this helps

God Bless


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The term for being kicked out or excluded from church membership is
yaroslaw [1]
<span>The term for being kicked out or excluded from church membership is "excommunication," although such practices are far less common today than they were in ancient times. 
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
History’s greatest naval invasions occurred at
Digiron [165]
Guinness says that Operation Overload in World War II was the greatest but each teacher probably has a different answer
7 0
3 years ago
Who were the victims of the Armenian genocide
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

children were the victim

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The compromise of 1850 allowed which state to enter the united states as a free state?
    7·1 answer
  • What was imperialism​
    13·1 answer
  • What aspect of Greek life does the excerpt show?
    14·1 answer
  • What type of interest group focuses on interests concerning a specific issue?
    10·1 answer
  • Years and he or she must be
    10·2 answers
  • How does the federal government pay for itself
    12·1 answer
  • Place each figure in order from most powerful to least powerful on the two hierarchy diagrams.
    12·1 answer
  • HURRY PLS AM TIMED!! ANSWER IF U KNOW IT PLS
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!! In your opinion was this expansion by the United States morally right or wrong? Give me three reasons to su
    12·1 answer
  • The Midwest is a part of the United States that is made up of many different states. People describe these states as the “Midwes
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!