Answer:
on July 10, 1925, the Scopes Monkey trial began in Dayton, Tennessee. High school teacher John Thomas Scopes was charged with violating Tennessee's law against teaching evolution instead of the divine creation of man. The trial was the first to be broadcasted on live radio.
On July 10, the Monkey Trial got underway, and within a few days hordes of spectators and reporters had descended on Dayton as preachers set up revival tents along the city’s main street to keep the faithful stirred up. Inside the Rhea County Courthouse, the defense suffered early setbacks when Judge John Raulston ruled against their attempt to prove the law unconstitutional and then refused to end his practice of opening each day’s proceeding with prayer.
In the courtroom, Judge Raulston destroyed the defense’s strategy by ruling that expert scientific testimony on evolution was inadmissible–on the grounds that it was Scopes who was on trial, not the law he had violated. The next day, Raulston ordered the trial moved to the courthouse lawn, fearing that the weight of the crowd inside was in danger of collapsing the floor.
There's more but this is a sum up of what went down
Hope this helps!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems that there is no question here, just a statement.
What is your question? What do you want to know?
If this is a true or false question, the answer is "true."
It is true that the US has never experienced a period in which a single political party existed and there was little if any political conflict.
On the contrary, political parties have always existed in the history of the United States. First, it started with two political factions: Federalists with people like James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay; and Antifederalists with people like Thomas Jefferson or Samuel Adams.
Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been different political parties, but the dominant political forces have always been Republicans and Democrats, creating a bipartisan political system.
Not all of the people in one country should only have one religion, they meant to accept other people in the area to make the country more diverse and have a better foundation
I think this question needs a personal opinion for the answer, but here's what i would say-
I believe that a two-party system, although it categorises the two sets of basic values of both Americans, excludes other beliefs and values that are silenced in a two-party system.
-Hope this is what you're looking for, maybe add more of your opinion to it?
Answer:
Step 1: Find your connected connectors.
Step 2: Build a new power brand.
Step 3: Lower the barrier, flatten the path.
Step 4: Move people up the participation scale.
Explanation:
