This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read 'Hearts and Hands', by William Sydney Porter
Which statement best describes the situational irony of the ending of the story?
A)- The reader doesn't expect to learn that Easton is the counterfeiter.
B). The reader expects Easton to ask to visit Miss Fairchild, and he doesn't
C)- Miss Fairchild expects Easton to ask her to join him out West, and he doesn't.
D). The reader doesn't expect other passengers to be listening to Miss Fairchild's conversation.
Answer: A)- The reader doesn't expect to learn that Easton is the counterfeiter.
Explanation:
When Miss Fairchild recognizes Mr. Easton as one of the two men handcuffed to each other on the train, she, and the reader, are led to believe that Mr. Easton is a United States marshall on his way to take the man he´s handcuffed to into prison. However, when Mr. Easton and his companion leave, two passengers talk about the conversation that had taken place with Miss Fairchild. Based on how Mr. Easton and his companion were handcuffed, they come to the conclusion that Mr. Easton was actually the prisoner and not the Marshall.
Answer:
D.
“Montagues” and “Capulets”
Explanation:
Romeo and Juliet are individuals, not groups. Letter B is also mentioning individuals. Letter C is about abstract concepts. For us to have a conflict between groups as the outline suggests, we need two groups and that's what we have in option D. Montagues and Capulets are family names, each having many people carrying the same name. They're family groups. Also, in the Play (Romeo and Juliet), the two families hate one another.
Answer:
D: is completely baffled.
Explanation:
