Travelogue refers to the description of someone's trip experience given in the form of narrative, public lecture, slide show or stir picture.
The erudite rudiments which generally appears in a travelogue includes-
- A person's account of his or her gests . The person gives details about his experience while traveling.
- Descriptions of sights, societies, climates, and lands. The Traveller describes the culture of where he visited, the kind of climate in the region, the land and everything seen on his way to the new place.
- Delineations, photos, charts, or cairn. The rubberneck can also make some delineations to produce a visual representation of the effects he saw, take photos and draw charts of the place visited.
learn more about travelogue here:
brainly.com/question/18611768
#SPJ10
They most likely belive that as, he travled he had new ideas that made him revise it.
I believe the answer is B.
Answer:
Hovstad and Billing are both hypocrites, that is the overall summary of their characters.
They both appear to support Dr. Stockmann and his work, but they are later revealed to each have their own agendas separate to what they pretend to believe in.
Explanation:
Hosvtad is the editor of The People's Messenger, a newspaper in the play "an Enemy of the People". He has the reputation of being the liberal of the town and wants to starts a revolution. Initially his ideas appear to be genuine, especially as he offers to publish Dr. Stockmann's controversial findings. However, it turns out he only wants to further his own agenda (i.e increase his paper's circulation) using the findings, instead of using them to bring about real social change.
He is revealed to be hypocritical when he turns on Dr. Stockmann and changes his beliefs and what he portrays in his newspaper whenever public opinion changes.
Hovstad strengths and weaknesses both take root from his newspaper.
Billing is the sub-editor the newspaper, he mirrors the ideas of Hovstad with a few personal opinions of himself. He criticizes others for being conservative and claims to be a radical progressive, he is later revealed to be a hypocrite of his own ideals when he applied for a job within the government he supposedly hates.
They initially supported Dr. Stockmann but turned on him later when they found that his opinions will not be popular with the public.
