This keeps the tone consistent in explaining the detail of how/what the wall is made (of)
first option goes with author opinion which is not necessary and ruins tone
Second option yet again goes to author's opinion which would ruin tone
Third option is just not scientifically correct and has absolutely nothing to do with how the wall is built.
So that leaves the last option which is the most logical and won't ruin the tone. It strictly adds the fact on how long the wall is with no opinion. Just like with the paragraph!
<span>They both utilizing the surprise and mystery nature. Sometimes we can be too focused on what's in front of us that we miss what we would have otherwise saw.</span>