In the article, the author - Neil de Grasse Tyson discusses parapsychology and writes that comparing it with real science is absurd because there is no way to support the sixth sense in humans. He notes that our senses are limited and scientific knowledge is needed to prove the theories. The correct answer is D.
Explanation: how should I explain the two examples I gave plz help 20 points or moreThe setting and what is happening in no dog's bark provide imagery. "As his hands grabbed his father's throat, he clutched at the head, shaking as if it were a rattle." The details evoke a vivid image in the reader's mind, especially when the author uses an example of a rattle. in the sentence "there was the moon facing them a large red moon that filled their eyes with light and stretched and darkened its shadow over the earth" The details that the author uses to describe the moon and how they looked and how the earth looked was extremely specific and had enough detail to paint the image in our minds.
Answer:
<em>You haven't attached Paragraph 4, so I'll answer the question according to my understanding.</em>
C) They sailed to France and Belgium and told them that England and Scotland was a land they (the Phoenicians) had been to and found tin and lead there.
Explanation:
"Phoenicians" were very skilled in <em>building ships</em> and <em>navigating turbulent waters.</em> This allowed them to<em> travel and trade</em> from one place to the other.
Upon reaching the Islanders, they were able to trade with them. The Islanders gave them metals in exchange for their goods. These people in Britain were actually poor savages and didn't look clean. Yet, the Phoenicians sailed to France and Belgium and told them that "Britain" <em>(England and Scotland)</em> was a land where they had found "tin" and "lead." <u>These materials were very important during those times. </u>The French and the Belgians were then convinced and decided to come over the Islands as well.
<span>"I am slowing down" car language is this homework help</span>
