Answer:
This topic is a bad idea because it will give the impression that she evaluated the film based on personal concepts.
Explanation:
The way your friend refers to the film reflects her disgust with science fiction films, or with this specific film. This concept should not be presented in a class assignment, because it would discredit your friend's work, showing that she doesn't know how to evaluate a film in a technical and impartial way, without taking into account her personal feelings and concepts regarding the story.
Answer:
- Preposterous.
Explanation:
As per the question, the boldfaced word that best accomplishes the given sentence would be 'preposterous' as the another option goes completely out of context. The word 'preposterous' implies 'something absurd or ludicrous which is contrary to common sense' that appropriately fits to the context of the sentence and completes as well as accomplishes its meaning. After using this word, the sentence would imply that however, in earlier times the consideration of Earth as flat was an accepted fact but for today's scientist it is simply '<u>preposterous</u>' or 'senseless or shocking'.
Answer:
"But its not a pretty sight"
Explanation:
That is the euphemism.
It looks as though this essay should be an argumentative/persuasive essay. As such, there are two main ways to construct this. Knowing you should refute two points from the article, you could do this by either mentioning the opposing viewpoints first then your refutes (known as the block method), or you could do this point by point by stating an opposing viewpoint, then refuting it in the same paragraph (known as the point-by-point method). That said, here are two sample outlines assuming you mention two points:
OUTLINE 1 (Block Method)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-opposing viewpoint 2
Body Paragraph 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
OUTLINE 2 (Point-by-Point)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
Body Paragraph 2
-opposing viewpoint 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
