Answer:
Mostly because the death rate fell tremendously.
Explanation:
The main causes of population growth had to do with diet and hygiene and health care.
The Agricultural Revolution (which started in the 17th century) led to better food production and thus better diet and nutrition for people, so healthier lives.
The Industrial Revolution (beginning in the mid 18th century) pushed cities to create better sanitation methods to avoid cholera and other disease epidemics.
And the ongoing advances in medicine ever since the Scientific Revolution were doing their part also to increase lifespans.
This is really a your opinion question. but in my opinion i think they would because that’s a well established city
The US economy after World War I relied in large part on
<span>construction.</span>
Answer: I would support this endeavor, because we are running out of resources on Earth. Colonizing Mars would also open up new jobs on and off Earth. Some would argue that we could better spend that money on helping save our planet rather the colonizing a new one. I would have to say good luck, getting the oil executives and other current un-renewable energy executives to sign up for that one. It would take hundreds of years and more money to switch from where we are now to completely renewable. Also the benefits of the scientific boom from that kind of money being put into those programs would be enormous, and not just in the space exploration. It would also help just about every other scientific field as well.
Explanation:
Answer:
He created the Embargo Act and he also launched the US navy at the Barbary States.
Explanation:
Since the Barbary Pirates were stealing US merchant boats, he first created the Embargo Act, which prohibited trade with other countries (at least for the time being). He then launched ships into the Mediterranean, resulting in the first Barbary War, that the US won.
