Vikings
more specifically leif eriksson
Answer:
This statement can be justified giving the following arguments.
When citizens show their dissatisfaction, it clearly shows that they are actively taking part in democratic projects, because this system is their own.
A public expression of dissatisfaction shows that people are not just forcefully following or agreeing with whatever they are told.
It shows that they are enjoying their freedom and hence they are no more subjects but are responsible citizens.
Their freedom and transformation from the status of subjects to that of citizens is the main aim of democracy.
As people get benefits, they ask for more. This makes democracy better
Explanation:
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Apartheid was established by the national list government of South Africa as a means of separating any non-white peoples of the country. Apartheid in its most basic translation means "to keep apart" or to "separate".
