1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
chubhunter [2.5K]
3 years ago
7

What was bismarck's mistake and how did he fix it?

History
1 answer:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Bismarck’s seemingly impregnable position had a weak spot: the emperor had to regard him as indispensible. The old emperor, William I, remained faithful until his death on March 9, 1888. He never forgot that Bismarck had saved him from “liberalism” in 1862. Frederick III, his son and successor, was bound to Bismarck by memory of the triumphs of 1870. Liberal in phrase, he was at best National Liberal and, like the other National Liberals, would have made his peace with Bismarck in exchange for a few concessions. He was already a dying man when he took the crown, however, and his reign of 99 days ended on June 15, 1888.

You might be interested in
Which was an important part of New England’s economy by the 1660s?
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

B: shipbuilding

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Briefly explain Marx, Owen, and Adam Smith and how they connect to the different "isms”.
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

...“The father of modern economics supported a limited role for government. Mark Skousen writes in "The Making of Modern Economics", Adam Smith believed that, "Government should limit its activities to administer justice, enforcing private property rights, and defending the nation against aggression." The point is that the farther a government gets away from this limited role, the more that government strays from the ideal path... How this issue is handled will decide whether the country can more closely follow Adam Smith's prescription for growth and wealth creation or move farther away from it.”

Jacob Viner addressed the laissez-faire attribution to Adam Smith in 1928...

Here is a list of appropriate activities for government, which goes way, way beyond Mark Skousen’s extremely limited – and vague – 'ideal' government. That ... he goes on to attribute his ‘ideal’ list to Adam Smith ... is not alright.In fact, its downright deceitful, for which there is no excuse of ignorance (before attributing the limited ideal to Adam Smith we assume, as scholars must, that Skousen read Wealth Of Nations and noted what Smith actually identified as the appropriate roles of government in the mid-18th century).

8 0
3 years ago
The nazi party had became largest party by?​
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

The Nazi party became the largest party by organized the Bamberg Conference. Hitler wanted to reunify the party, and set out a plan for the next few years. Whilst some small differences remained, Hitler was largely successful in reuniting the socialist and nationalist sides of the party.

In the same year, Hitler restructured the Nazi Party to make it more efficient.

Firstly, the Nazi Party adopted a new framework, which divided Germany into regions called Gaue. Each Gaue had its own leader, a Gauleiter. Each Gaue was then divided into subsections, called Kreise. Each Kreise then had its own leader, called a Kreisleiter. Each Kreise was then divided into even smaller sections, each with its own leader, and so on. Each of these sections were responsible to the section above them, with Hitler at the very top of the party with ultimate authority.

The Nazis also established new groups for different professions, from children, to doctors, to lawyers. These aimed to infiltrate already existing social structures, and help the party gain more members and supporters.

These political changes changed the Nazi Party from a paramilitary organization focused on overthrowing the republic by force, to one focused on gaining power through elections and popular support.

Explanation:

Long story short the Nazi party got to power so quickly by many reasons. Hitler had a lot of supporters, ended up brainwashing people basically, and not only were grown adults part of the Nazi Party, Hitler created something called "Nazi Youth" which was basically the teaching and brainwashing of young kids/teenagers on how to fight.

7 0
3 years ago
20
Nataly [62]
Gay Exclamation gay
8 0
3 years ago
How did the Vietnam War and its outcome damage the image of the United States? Why?
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

The outcome of the Vietnam War was a humiliation for the United States. America had originally entered the war to prevent the Communist North Vietnamese and their guerrilla allies in the South from taking over the whole country. Despite the vast expenditure of blood and treasure, that aim was never realized.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what year did the United States reach its peak involvement in the Vietnam War?
    12·1 answer
  • Answer ASAP PLZ!!!! I need help (>~<)
    5·2 answers
  • What is an example of something u can’t yell in a theater
    6·1 answer
  • What happened after four candidates ran for president in 1860
    12·1 answer
  • President Nixon believed that the
    10·2 answers
  • What are the benefits of federalism?
    14·1 answer
  • Can anyone help? I don't know :(
    9·1 answer
  • How did America settle it's conflict with Britain over Canada
    5·1 answer
  • What was a benefit of the samurai style of armor?
    14·1 answer
  • Over time, the power of the presidency in using executive orders has expanded because
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!