This case supported the existence of Jim Crow Laws because their decision was "separate but equal". The Jim Crow Laws were based on "separate but equal". For instance, blacks and whites had the same bathroom, but they had two separate ones.
Hope this helps.
(Please mark this as brainliest if it helped you)
Answer:
descriptive investigation
Explanation:
The correct answer is a descriptive investigation. An investigation which does not involve hypotheses called descriptive investigation.
Sugar, slaves, spices, tobacco, tea, etc.
Answer:
They were kept from combat roles is the correct answer.
Explanation:
a. Attendees are hoping to talk about reversal of the protectionist trade barriers.
b. They are motivated by the sustenance for a wider constitutional convention
c. They hope that more states would be represented and that their delegates authorized to examine wider areas<span>.</span>
