The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
Answer:
the Africans in the inlands of Africa resisted
Explanation:
they didn't know anything about Africa so they stayed near the coast. Africa said" no get off my land I don't want to be explored".
Answer:
In recent years, Sunni–Shia relations have been increasingly marked by conflict, particularly the Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict. Sectarian violence persists to this day from Pakistan to Yemen and is a major element of friction throughout the Middle East and South Asia.
Explanation:
First democratic government in the colonies.
Answer: It would have reduced the number of foreign-born people entering the United States.
When an additional requirement for immigration is put in place, it becomes harder for people to qualify. Therefore, less people are able to come into the country.
The bill would not necessarily mean that workers would not be able to find jobs, as many jobs did not require literacy. Moreover, the bill did not apply to people who had already entered the United States. For the same reason, it would not have changed the number of deportations. Finally, the bill would not have necessarily impacted the number of jobs that Americans could access, as this depends on many other factors. The only possible answer is the fourth option.
