Answer: With Mrs. Linde, Nora reveals her insensitivity and lack of shame about the forgery she committed. She implies that Mrs. Linde has obviously aged since they last met 10 years earlier, which accounts for Nora’s inability to recognize her old friend. Although Nora seems sympathetic to Mrs. Linde’s plight, she can’t seem to control herself from boasting about her three children, her husband’s recent promotion, and how good she feels to finally have some money to spend. In a way, she seems to be flaunting her good fortune in front of Mrs. Linde who, deprived of all these benefits, has come to ask Nora for help. It is also through her interactions with Mrs. Linde that we realize something deeper lies under Nora’s seemingly childish exterior. She reveals the secret of her forgery to Mrs. Linde and seems to see herself as quite resourceful for having done it.
In the company of Dr. Rank, Nora is freer than she is with her own husband. She openly laughs with joy at knowing that all the other bank employees will be under her husband’s control. She offers Dr. Rank a macaroon, apparently forgetting that he knows she is forbidden to eat them. She then quickly covers for herself by claiming that Mrs. Linde brought them. Nora seems much more assertive and free with these other characters, as well as unabashedly willing to scheme, lie, and justify her transgressions as altruistic.
Krogstad provides an interesting parallel to Nora. Like Nora, he too is guilty of committing forgery, for which Torvald condemns him and decides to fire him. Although Krogstad is a man and Nora a woman, their crimes of forgery unite them. In fact, Krogstad might represent what Nora would be like if she were a man and were not strictly scrupulous like her husband is. For example, she tells Mrs. Linde that "A barrister's profession is such an uncertain thing, especially if he won't undertake unsavoury cases; and naturally Torvald has never been willing to do that." Perhaps Nora would have delved into the unsavory, given how opposite she is to her husband. Krogstad's is also the only harsh voice of reality that Nora is forced to hear, and that is because he blackmails her for her help regaining his job at the bank. Finally, Torvald’s reaction to Krogstad’s forgery seems to foreshadow his harsh and cold reaction to Nora’s forgery.
Include all footnotes from the original text, cite the source after the direct quotation is used, and include illustrations or graphics from the original text must writers do when using language taken directly from an outside source.
<h3>What
language does an author use?</h3>
To create their life more informative and fascinating, they may mix symbolism, literal and metaphorical language, and auditory tools. Even without overtly declaring it.
There are certain option given which is missing in the question, they are-
include all footnotes from the original text
use quotation marks around the author’s words
cite the source after the direct quotation is used
include illustrations or graphics from the original text
explain how the quotation supports their point
Thus, option A, C and D are correct.
For more details about language does an author use, click here:
brainly.com/question/23136596
#SPJ1
Answer:
I like that the film version tells the story better for Jim Valentine because in the film we can get a better idea of what the characters look like. The film version gives us something that we can’t experience in a book like emotions and facial expressions. For example, when the character is in a sad scene you can’t see how they react in a book but the film, you can see how they react. Also the picture of the setting we can hear how the music goes. With the play, the lighting will get darker and in the emotional scenes and get brighter and a happy scene. The scenes are best portrayed in the film. In the text, you can't hear their tone or you can’t see the setting or the characteristics of the character. In conclusion, the film version is better at telling the story of Jim Valentine because it gives us a better picture of the story.
Explanation:
i hope this helps i revised it a bit added puctuations comas and fixed run on sentences
Answer:
the controversy is clear with this one lo.l
