Answer:
the net book value of the asset halfway through its useful life will be less than if straight-line depreciation is used.
Explanation:
Let me use an example to illustrate this.
An asset has a useful life of 4 years. It costs $1000. It has a salvage value of 0
If the straight line depreciation method is used , the depreciation expense every year = $1000/ 4 = $250
The net book value halfway through its useful life = $1000 - ($250 x 2) = $500
If double declining method is used, the depreciation expense in the first year would be = 2/4 x $1000 = $500
The net book value at the beginning of year 2 = $1000 - $500 = $500
Depreciation expense in year 2 = 2/4 x $500 = $250
The net book value at the beginning of year 3 = $500 - $250 = $250
We can see that the net book value halfway through the useful is lower when double declining depreciation method is used
Call them and tell them to not do it, if they don't listen, call the police...simple...
Answer:
dilation of the pupil and loss of accommodation
Explanation:
Mydriasis is the dilation of the pupil of the eye. The dilation causes vision to be blurry.
Cycloplegia on the other hand is the loss of accommodation of the pupil and it is caused by the paralysis of the cilliary muscle of the eye. This paralysis causes the eyes to lose its ability to focus on things nearby.
Looking at this two conditions from the administration of atropine, the expected outcome of the client is blurry vision and inability to focus or see things close by(farsightedness).
I hope this helps.
Answer: c. small changes in economic growth rate lead to large GDP changes over time.
Explanation:
If there is even a small change in the rate at which the economy is growing, this increase will increase by even more the year afterward and then even more as time goes on. This is because the interest is being compounded overtime.
Look at the future value formula that shows compounding for instance:
Future value = Amount * (1 + rate) ^ number of periods
Assume even a change of 2% in the growth rate. In 30 years, this rate would have increased the economy by:
= 1 * ( 1 + 2%)³⁰
= 1.81
Which is a rate of:
= 1.81 - 1
= 81%
What started off as only 2% became 81% in 30 years. This is what compounding does.
