One clue word could be the main character saying "well I think" or any disagreement
The Two Fridas (Las dos Fridas in Spanish) is an oil painting by Mexican artist Frida Kahlo. The painting was the first large-scale work done by Kahlo and is considered one of her most notable paintings.[1] It is a double self-portrait, depicting two versions of Kahlo seated together. One is wearing a white European-style Victorian dress while the other is wearing a traditional Tehuana dress.[1] The painting was created in 1939, the same year that Kahlo divorced Diego Rivera,[1] although they remarried a year later.
Some art historians have suggested that the two figures in the painting are a representation of Frida's dual heritage.[2] Her father, Guillermo Kahlo, was German; while her mother, Matilde Calderon, was Mestizo (a mix of Spanish and Native American).[3] Another interpretation is that the Tehuana Frida is the one who was adored by her husband Diego Rivera, while the European Frida is the one that was rejected by him.[4] In Frida's own recollection, the image is of a memory of a childhood imaginary friend.[5]
Both Fridas hold items in their lap; the Mexican Frida holds a small portrait of Diego Rivera, and the European Frida holds forceps. Blood spills onto the European Frida's white dress from a broken blood vessel that has been cut by the forceps. The blood vessel connects the two Fridas, winding its way from their hands through their hearts.[6] The work alludes to Kahlo's life of constant pain and surgical procedures and the Aztec tradition of human sacrifice.[6] Because this piece was completed by Kahlo shortly after her divorce, the European Frida is missing a piece of herself, her Diego.[4]
According to Kahlo's friend, Fernando Gamboa, the painting was inspired by two paintings that Kahlo saw earlier that year at the Louvre, Théodore Chassériau's The Two Sisters and the anonymous Gabrielle d'Estrées and One of Her Sisters.[7]
The answer would be 3 i have taken this before
Well, Yayoi Kusama uses repetition with her iconic polka dots and similar colors. Her vivid colors or pink blue and yellow make a contrasting piece of work. Everything combines to make unity.
Answer: No, it wouldn’t be a work of art.
Explanation: It wouldn’t be a work of Art because the artistic value is lost since the art loses its subjectivity. When the Artist work was allowed to hang in a public space, it had boundaries and was defined by no rules. It was a beautiful fusion of art and design viewed by all. Design and Art is objective; it’s primary function is to express the imagination in non grammatical ways. Those ways are determined by the artists and those that view it.
If this piece of work belonged to a corporation, it would lose its power of reflection and instead the corporation it belonged to would be in charge of allowing the art piece to reflect or convey a new form of visual rhetoric. This new framework would allow the corporation to communicate their own message, idea, or point of view. Which no longer makes it subjective.
